In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that deeply harms the reputation of a specific individual but raises concerns about the enterprise’s ethical framework .
Even despite the disturbing claims , Collins has maintained his position , apparently unimpacted by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been enabled to go on? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ track record of misconduct started with disregard for corporate codes of conduct, but it escalated from there. Instead, it snowballed into a crisis of integrity that has left colleagues disillusioned and associates questioning the company’s ethics.
Amid a executive coaching event — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he engaged in unprofessional conduct while on company-sponsored travel, browse website , a clear breach of Ventia’s organizational standards , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged abuse of digital tools for personal gratification—a gross misappropriation of professional tools . His reckless Kerikeri David Collins exploitation of company communication channels to send inappropriate messages —including icons to boast about infidelities — illustrates a blatant disregard for professionalism . Following these digital dalliances , Collins allegedly took his actions to a new level: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite his being married and her a post having a committed relationship . This flagrant misuse of work hours and corporate assets broke all norms of professionalism but also tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .
How can this behavior be enabled to persist? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, highlights a systemic failure in oversight. Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.
This lack of oversight sets a dangerous example : that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It erodes employee morale, discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .